The end of academic selection, and Catholic acquiescence thereat

girls-aloud

If there’s one thing about the north of Ireland that has continually disappointed leftists, it’s the non-emergence of class politics. To be more precise, it’s the failure of reality to match up to a schema whereby a big class struggle will emerge and in short order dissolve sectarian politics.

But that isn’t to say that socio-economic divisions don’t manifest themselves. Rather, it’s that they don’t manifest themselves in a cross-sectarian way, but rather within the communal blocs. This fits with the federal structure of our politics, and is more or less what you’d expect under the New Dispensation. There’s been something of that lately around the issue of the reform of post-primary education. I therefore direct readers to Fionnuala O’Connor’s last column in the Irish News – it isn’t vintage Fionnuala in that she skirts around the issue without saying what she thinks, but does highlight a few interesting points. As indeed does the issue as a whole.

One thing that’s been sort of perplexing is that virtually the only opposition to Caitríona Ruane’s grand plans has come from unionists in the Assembly and their outriders in our press. At Stormont, all the unionist MLAs with the exception of the PUP’s Dawn Purvis have been pro-grammar, and all the nationalists without exception have supported a non-selective system. This is strange, not least because of recent figures showing that, in terms of exam results, nine of the top ten schools were in the Catholic maintained sector. Meanwhile, prestigious Protestant schools like Campbell and Methody are not performing as one might expect.

There’s a backstory here in terms of demographics. First you have to realise that the majority of the school-age population is Catholic, while the Protestant school-age population is gradually declining against the capacity in the controlled sector. This means that Protestant secondaries have been facing closure, while Protestant grammars have kept up their headcount by diversifying their intake. Looking at Methody as an example, which has had to deal with the Protestant exodus from south Belfast, it hasn’t really diversified much in class terms – its geographical catchment area includes Sandy Row, and you have to draw the line somewhere – but it has taken in quite a number of kids from upwardly mobile Catholic families as well as the ethnic communities. Other Protestant grammars have quietly become less selective, so that instead of taking in the top twenty percent in their area they may be taking in the top thirty to forty percent. Not a comprehensive system, but not exactly grammars as we used to know them.

What is difficult to figure out is why the unionists are so hellbent on retaining the grammars when organic factors have been transforming their character like this. I can only conclude that it’s part of unionism’s general reverence for the status quo. And the broadening of the grammars’ intake actually lessens pressure for reform. As I say, the PUP is the exception, but their heavily underclass vote has different priorities from the more respectable end of the working class.

On the Catholic side, things are even odder. Coming back to Fionnuala’s column, she mentions Derry-based educator Fr Ignatius McQuillan, who has been sounding off in the media about this. When I heard him on the radio the other day, Fr Iggy was condemning the Catholic bishops for bowing the knee to the agenda of Sinn Féin and the trade unions. It’s unusual enough to hear this sort of dissent from within the northern Church – during the Troubles, a grand total of three priests aired political disagreements with the hierarchy, and one of those was Pat Buckley, who doesn’t count – but the points of interest go well beyond that. Why, Fr Iggy is asking in essence, is there no opposition?

One may well ask why there is no opposition even within the unions. Whenever you have a teaching union official on Talk Back – whether they’re from INTO, the NAS/UWT or the Protestant Association of Teachers UTU – they all seem to be very happy with supporting whatever Caitríona wants to do. And yet, given that lots of their members actually work in the grammars, their anti-selective stance can’t be universally popular within the unions. And yet, you don’t ever hear a hint of this. Puzzling.

But more puzzling yet is the position of the Catholic bishops, who have acted as enforcers for the Department of Education in ordering schools within the maintained sector not to proceed with transfer tests beyond next year. That in itself poses problems for those right-on activists who would like to believe that the hierarchy are hidebound reactionaries bent on spoiling our shiny new comprehensive future.

And then we turn to the Patriotic Catholic Association SDLP, who continually make me scratch my head. Listen, I can understand why the Shinners want to abolish selection. It’s a policy that would appeal to their traditional base. It would be less appealing to the layer of former SDLP supporters they would like to cannibalise, but it could only be a potential deal-breaker if the SDLP put up a fight on the issue. Yet they won’t.

I’m not certain, but there may be an ideological element to this, to the extent that the SDLP has an ideology. When they had their split with the big Belfast personalities thirty years ago, Gerry and Paddy’s main charge was that the party had abandoned its socialism in favour of Catholic conservatism. Granted that there are people in the party like Eddie McGrady who really are Catholic conservatives (and where is Eddie on this issue?), it depends what you mean by socialism. The gas-and-water NILPism favoured by Gerry and Paddy never had much traction in the post-1979 SDLP, but from the dominant Derry faction you had the esoteric ideological blend known as Humespeak, which amongst other elements, like a thoroughgoing bureaucratism and a bizarre attachment to the European Union, also had a sort of lukewarm egalitarianism that meant St John Hume or Séamus Mallon were never that far out of place when taking their places on the green benches beside Neil Kinnock.

Humespeak as an ideology never really meant much to your average SDLP voter, who is a respectable codger simply looking for a Catholic party to vote for that isn’t called Sinn Féin. I like Joe Hendron a lot personally, but as a politician he understood that he didn’t need any social or economic policies – he just needed not to be Gerry Adams. Where Humespeak came into its own, though, was as the ideology of the young Turks who for twenty years ran Queens Students Union (for British readers, this is a bit like UKIP running a students union, only that doesn’t quite capture how ghastly it was), the training ground for the party’s meagre cadre. Durkan and Attwood, the original young Turks, were the best of the bunch – when it came to the bozos who succeeded them, they had to be seen to be believed.

So you have Caitríona announcing a really progressive-sounding Grand Plan culled from reports by Queens education department, and the SDLP have nothing critical to say about it. Perhaps it’s that their ideology – the fact that they like to think of themselves as social democrats – disarms them. Perhaps it’s a general caution. Yet, there is populist hay to be made there amongst the Catholic middle class. It’s not as if the grammars are unpopular – those ambitious Derry parents practically battering down the doors of Lumen Christi are surely Durko’s natural electorate. And, even if you’re nervous about taking on the Catholic hierarchy, Fr Iggy has shown the way.

Maybe it’s my cynical nature, but I suspect there might be an element here of the Durkan-Attwood brains trust being too clever for their own good. They may have calculated that the unionists at Stormont would use the weighted voting system in the Assembly to torpedo Caitríona’s plans, and then they could posture a little without actually having had to take a serious stand that might have alienated some potential voters. That would certainly fit their track record.

But it’s all terribly weak, isn’t it? To be brutally honest, a party that won’t fight for the interests of its base is a party that doesn’t deserve to exist. And if the South Down and Londonderry Party is going to go extinct, with this sort of performance, it only has itself to blame.

10 Comments

  1. Ciarán said,

    July 26, 2009 at 12:30 am

    If there’s one thing about the north of Ireland that has continually disappointed leftists, it’s the non-emergence of class politics.

    I’ve one word for those leftists to consider – colonialism.

    What I really wanted to comment about though was the Fionnuala O’Connor reference, just in case you missed Ian Knox’s cartoon in the Irish News the same day.

  2. Luton Diesel said,

    July 26, 2009 at 9:13 am

    I think Iggy’s been a Monsignor since the late 80s. Seeing the words ‘Fr Iggy’ on the interwebs, I can’t believe nobody ever thought of calling him FrIggy when he was Prez (of St Columb’s, from 1982 until the early 90s). Former Fermanagh hurler, I seem to recall…

  3. splinteredsunrise said,

    July 26, 2009 at 9:24 am

    I expected Iggy would be a Monsignor. I haven’t been to Derry in years and don’t generally pay much attention to it, so I was a little surprised that he was still knocking about. If he’s a hurler, that tells you something – I like to watch it, but still think you have to be a bit bonkers to play it.

  4. splinteredsunrise said,

    July 26, 2009 at 9:26 am

    And that wasn’t a bad cartoon. Ian hits the nail on the head again.

  5. ejh said,

    July 26, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Wouldn’t the Unionist attachment to grammars be less because they always support the status quo and more because the idea of being just a bit better than your neighbours is fundamental to their worldview?

  6. July 26, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    “party that won’t fight for the interests of its base is a party that doesn’t deserve to exist” … reminds of some more parties on other islands and continents which have terms like “Labour” or “Social Democrat” in their name

  7. Madam Miaow said,

    July 26, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    Har, har!!! Haven’t read the piece. Just got stuck on the pic. (Ooh, Splinty, I bet some of your readers are pleased that webpages don’t get stuck together, knowarramean?)

  8. splinteredsunrise said,

    July 26, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Girls Aloud used as shameless traffic bait… why not?

  9. Garibaldy said,

    July 27, 2009 at 10:20 am

    Just on the what the complete fuck-up by Ruane and the Provos of the 11 Plus tells us about the non-emergence of class politics. I think that the fact that such a golden opportunity was squandered reflects the reality of the contradictions between trying to marry progressive politics to an all-class nationalism. It just cannot be done with any consistency. Ciarán blames it on colonialism. I think that the question is a lot more complicated than that, especially as the nature of the relationship between Britain and Ireland has undergone immense changes over the centuries. Terms like colonialism can hide more than they reveal if they are used to suggest their is some unchangeing entity since 1969 (not that I’m saying that is what Ciarán is saying).

  10. TjOC said,

    July 27, 2009 at 11:37 pm

    Garibaldy,

    If not colonialism, what do you think accounts for the tribal/sectarian uniqueness of Norn Iron? I’ve lived in several countries and travelled widely, but have not been to another part of the first world so divided and ghettoised.

    I think it’s telling that the 26 counties did manage to overcome sectarian divisions, leaving lots of Protestants with their wealth and liberty. It’s not 100% comparable as Protestants were a smaller minority, but I think it’s a reliable indication that outside of colonialism class politics emerges more readily.

    I agree with this:

    “the contradictions between trying to marry progressive politics to an all-class nationalism.”

    Of course republican socialists have been saying that for some time.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: