He’s not the Messiah, he’s a very naughty boy


Lately I’ve been reading Tariq Ali on Pakistan, which is always worthwhile – I’ll freely admit to blowing hot and cold on Tariq, but get him on his specialist subject and he can be tremendously enjoyable. One thing he’s particularly good on, drawing on plenty of first-hand knowledge, is the peculiar character of the Pakistan Peoples Party, since it emerged from the anti-junta movement in the 1960s.

And this is an object lesson in the difference between what a party formally stands for, and its sociological function. On paper, the PPP is a party of the left, a party that stands for the working man, and moreover an affiliate party of the Socialist International. Functionally, it’s a vehicle whereby the impoverished masses can register their support for wealthy feudal magnates – primarily the Bhutto family and their entourage – and thus help these magnates become even wealthier. The more the magnates fleece the peasants, the more fervently the masochistic peasants support them.

And they’re not alone. The Second International – which has quite a few rum members, all told – has several similar affiliates. I draw to your attention the Progressive Socialist Party of Lebanon, a party which is neither progressive nor socialist but exists mainly to allow the Druze peasants of the Chouf to demonstrate their fealty to the Jumblatt family. Or there is the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro, which is a vehicle for the peasants of the Black Mountain to dedicate themselves to the further enrichment of the tobacco-smuggling oligarch Milo Djukanović.

Now, I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking that this all sounds a bit like Premier League football. And so it does. In particular, it sounds a bit like Newcastle United, but that’s really because, as Jamie argues, the Toon demonstrate the pathologies of top-flight English football in a particularly clear form.

This is where, following Newcastle’s relegation, a little schadenfreude kicks in. It’s not unmixed, though, because over the last while I’ve been hearing quite a few sober Newcastle fans who’ve said, correctly, that they’ve been shockingly bad this season and fully deserve to go down. But on the other hand, you couldn’t get away from the kind of people who would ring TalkSport to bum and blow at inordinate length about how they were too big to go down. Now it’s clear that nobody’s too big to go down, if they don’t string some wins together.

So, let’s see that Shearer sticks around to sort things out. What are his options? Well, he may be aware of the chilling statistic that 40% of clubs relegated from the Premier League have never made it back. And he may also like to cast an eye over the fate of the best-supported club in League One – yes, it’s Leeds, another club whose fans thought they were too big and with too illustrious a history to go down. Once they were relegated, they had to face a tremendous hangover from their period of living the dream, a hangover that’s still to catch up with a huge denialist wing of their support.

What you’ve got at Newcastle is two interlinked problems, neither of which seems easily soluble. Firstly, the team. The manager may fancy clearing out the dead wood, which in this case means virtually the entire starting eleven. Having an enormous support base, and the third largest stadium in England, counts for little when you’ve a team full of lazy shits which has been serially underperforming for years. The core of the gang is the team that got Big Sam sacked, augmented by Dennis Wise’s inspired purchases – although I’m not sure whether he was inspired by astrology, voodoo or radio beams from Venus. A swinging hatchet would seem to be on the order of the day.

This may be tempting, given the second problem, which is economic. In other words, an enormous wages bill which will need some serious pruning back. But here’s the rub. Few if any of the lazy shits seem to have relegation clauses written into their contracts, the by-product of a club that assumed it was too big to go down, so the question would never arise. So a possible fire sale becomes quite a tricky proposition – you would have to pay off the lazy shits, then hope against hope that somebody’s willing to pay enough for them to make it worth your while. And there again, while the lazy shits might reckon themselves too good to be playing in the fizzy pop league, the cold logic of the transfer market might say differently.

So what’s left? Soldier on with that crippling wage bill and hope for an immediate return to the big league? Hope that Ashley will be willing to dip further into his dwindling fortune, or, in the event of him deciding he’s had enough, hoping that some Russian oligarch or Sheik of Araby will appear over the horizon? Or start again from scratch, hunkering down to possibly years of hard slog rebuilding?

I’ll also be interested, perhaps more so, in how the fans comport themselves. For a relegated team to show signs of arrogance, an assumption that they’re too good to be where they are, and have some sort of divine entitlement to be in the top flight, is the sort of thing that seriously fucks people off. That’s why Leeds, facing their third straight season in League One, are easily the most unpopular side in the league, which is quite an achievement when they’re rubbing shoulders with MK Dons. On the other hand, there have been relegated teams that have shown some humility, grafted their way back to success and won friends in the lower leagues in the process. How will the Geordies adapt to their new environment?

And, perhaps more to the point, is anyone going to get to grips with the Premier League’s bubble economy? From the look of things, I suspect a whole series of clubs will have to go bust before serious change comes onto the clár.


  1. May 27, 2009 at 9:59 am

    probably Newcastle should follow the example of the Berwick Rangers and join the Scottish Football League which would probably guarentee them a “place in Europe” every year and would also make the SPL more interesting

  2. Martin Wisse said,

    May 27, 2009 at 10:31 am

    Anybody willing to wager Middlesborough will be back before Newcastle?

  3. skidmarx said,

    May 27, 2009 at 11:29 am

    I did feel some sympathy for Leeds after their overcoming of the 15 point deduction. On the other hand I know several people in heaven seeing so many fat Geordies cry.
    The biggest clubs are most likely to bounce back. Leeds were in such a financial mess they hadn’t reached bottom with their first relegation, it’s still to be seen if Newcastle are in such a state.
    Disappointing that Millwall didn’t get promoted, but at least it wasn’t MK Dons.

  4. Freshly Squeezed Cynic said,

    May 27, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    Disappointing that Millwall didn’t get promoted, but at least it wasn’t MK Dons.

    However, Champions of the Conference South were a little team known as AFC Wimbledon; it’ll be interesting to follw their trajectory in the Conference.

  5. May 27, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    And Splinty, when did you start using the conjunction ‘and’ to start every other sentence? I quote:”And this is an object lesson in the difference between what a party formally stands for, and its sociological function.And they’re not alone.And so it does. And he may also like to cast an eye over the fate of the best-supported club in League One ….And there again, while the lazy shits might reckon themselves too good to be playing….And, perhaps more to the point, is anyone going to get to grips with the Premier League’s bubble economy? “

  6. WorldbyStorm said,

    May 27, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    You mean I presume the Socialist International, as distinct from the Second… ahem 😉

    But yeah, that thought struck me too a while ago that the SI is remarkably lax in terms of who it allows in, and the PPP is, as you say, a perfect example…

  7. splinteredsunrise said,

    May 27, 2009 at 8:47 pm

    To say nothing of its northern affiliate, the SDLP…

    I take your point, Stuart. I really must start throwing in Yea and Forsooth more often.

  8. charliemarks said,

    May 28, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    Pre-Shearer there was a lot of talk about Mike Ashley selling up – he even made the offer to fans. Why not each of you stump up a grand and buy me out? He asked. Nothing came of this (a grand each? wtf!) but the example of Barcelona as a fan-owned football giant is there to be emulated…

  9. Chris C said,

    May 28, 2009 at 11:36 pm

    Charlie’s point is instructive as is the point about AFC Wimbledon. There is a growing movement of fan owned clubs that are largely pushed to the bottom of ‘the pyramid’ then build from there. While Newcastle look set to go the way of Leeds Utd in terms of hubris and plummeting through the league, another very interesting case developing this summer is Liverpool FC. Hicks, co-owner, has been defaulting all year on his US sports ‘franchises’ and the loans from RBS (itself in some trouble) are up for payment in July.

    Meanwhile, fans have developed two organizations in addition to the Spirit of Shankly, etc. The first is a non-league club modelled on AFC Wimbledon and FC United that is currently considered a cheap option to see live football for LFC fans. The second the Share Liverpool group that uses the Barcelona model to lay the foundation for a bid for the club on behalf of fans if and when the Hicks regime retreats.

    The FA has created a crisis of meaning in modern football that is leading to grassroots organization and mobilization at a very long term level for a minority of fans. Some of this takes on a political character and has previously political activists at its heart. If there is a structural crisis of confidence in Westminster, it is no less the case in football.

    It may not be wishful thinking to suggest that Newcastle could and should follow the Barca model. The alternative is another Ken Bates scenario (sympathy for LUFC should always be tempered by the receivership in 2007-8).

  10. Seán said,

    May 30, 2009 at 9:18 am

    I would love LFC to follow the Barca model. Share Liverpool and Spirit of Shankly have been a good initiatives thus far, that have brought plenty of like-minded people together. However, at the moment, we may have to pries the club from Tom Hicks’ cold dead hands, a la Charlton Heston. Or if he does sell, he will probably be looking for rich Arab to at least make a healthy profit.

    Great post btw. Newcastle as a club seem to be imbued with an even greater sense of hubris than Man Utd. But at least United have some silverware to show off for their arrogance and £700 million plus debt.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: