Good old boys ride to Gordon’s rescue

And so it came to pass that Gordon Brown and Jacqui Smith have managed to get their proposal to detain shifty-looking brown people for up to 42 days through the Commons. Yet another milestone has been reached by the most authoritarian British government in living memory. Andy has already posted on the intrinsic significance of this. God help us, I suppose we must hope for the Lords to strike the measure down, which isn’t a comfortable position to be in.

But more interesting is the politics behind the win. The Labour rebels (and we don’t see nearly as much rebellion on the Labour benches as we used to, which tells you something) did actually manage to put the government under enormous pressure. So a formal majority of 66 was reduced to a majority of nine on the proposal.

And then you look at where that majority of nine came from. Say hello to the nine MPs from the Democratic Unionist Party, who voted with the government en bloc after several days of frantic discussions with Brown. Just to provide a little cushion, Brown was also backed by Ann Widdecombe, the sole Tory to break ranks, and maverick MP Bob Spink, who defected from the Tories to UKIP a couple of months back. In other words, Brown found himself relying on the most reactionary ratbags in the British parliament. Liam has some choice words on this.

As for the DUP, both Robbo and Singing Willie have publicly denied that Brown bought their votes. But they wouldn’t be doing their jobs if they hadn’t managed to extract some goodies. The DUP leadership are smart guys, and will be very much aware of how Smiler Molyneaux and Trimble used to squeeze John Major any time a close vote over Maastricht came up.

What these goodies will be, only time will tell. There’s been speculation about additional finance for Stormont. There has also been a rumour floating about that Brown has promised government assistance to ensure that any amendments to the Embryology Bill that might loosen the North’s ban on abortion would be blocked. If that’s the case, it says a lot for the government’s feminist credentials. Not to mention that they would put in the effort to retain the status quo on abortion for women in Britain, but women in Britain’s Irish colony don’t get the same consideration.

On the other hand, it may be that we should take the DUP at their word and assume that they, and Widdecombe and Spink, feel a genuine affinity for New Labour’s proposals. Wouldn’t that actually be scarier than an opportunistic deal?


  1. romach said,

    June 12, 2008 at 7:05 pm

    Its was no surprise to me what so ever that the DUP supported him. I tuned in last night and as soon as I heard the reporter say ‘by 9 votes’ I new immediately! I wonder what they have bargined with or for? I am sure it will filter out soon enough!

  2. June 12, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    Maybe Gordon promised Iris he’d straighten out all the gays.

    Interesting that the Labour movement would find itself so comfortable with the likes of Wild Willie. Another step forward in the dialectic, perhaps.

  3. ejh said,

    June 13, 2008 at 7:48 am

    Wouldn’t that actually be scarier than an opportunistic deal

    Why? What would it tell us about the DUP that we didn’t already know?

  4. June 13, 2008 at 8:17 am

    Maybe Brown has promised a statue of Paisley at his corpulent height in Westminster. That’s going to be a lorra lorra stone.

    Btw, that kid is terrifying.

  5. ejh said,

    June 13, 2008 at 10:02 am

    we don’t see nearly as much rebellion on the Labour benches as we used to

    Are you sure about this?

  6. Seán said,

    June 13, 2008 at 11:13 am

    How about a new verb for the English language?

    “To be DUPed. When a tired and corrupt government are resigned to pass dubious legislation desperately via the only means necessary – with support from the DUP. (Democratic Unionist Party) See John Major and the Maastricht Treaty.”

  7. splinteredsunrise said,

    June 13, 2008 at 11:29 am

    There don’t seem to be as many rebellions as in days of old. Of course that’s just impressionistic on my part.

  8. Andy Newman said,

    June 13, 2008 at 10:30 pm

    I think I remember reading in Norton’s “Commons in perspective” a standard textbook on constitutional law, that there is a clear trend in backbench rebellions, that they tend to happen when the government has lost its political credibility AND the government’s majority is slight enough for rebellions to be effective.

    Norton had analysed some 200 years of perlaimentary divisions, and if either condition was absent then there were few rebellions.

  9. Bob said,

    June 14, 2008 at 12:20 am

    So we gave these paddies generations worth of blood, gold and tears so that they could handg on to their ars* end of nowhere.

    And how do they repay us ?

    By voting for tyranny.

    Never mind 45 days, I think it’s time we scraped N Ireland off of our shoe.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: