May Day Massacre, part 2: Gauleiter Barnbrook goes to City Hall

Apart from the Tory victory last Thursday, one of the other depressing aspects of the local elections was the success of the BNP. This, it has to be said, was patchy, as the fascists failed to make the big breakthrough they had hoped for in their Lancashire, Yorkshire and Black Country strongholds. But their feat in surpassing the 5% mark in London and returning Richard Barnbrook, their leader on Barking and Dagenham council, to the GLA will have given them a spring in their step.

It will also, at least for the time being, strengthen the hand of the Griffin leadership within the fissile ranks of the BNP. Griffin, you see, has a cunning plan. Being a smart bloke, and not being content to spend the rest of his life leading an irrelevant sect, he’s been studying the examples of his analogues in Europe.

There really is no fundamental reason why Britain can’t have a sizeable right-populist party like you have in several European countries. But the candidates for that ecological niche have so far failed to fit the bill. UKIP had a certain amount of dynamism behind it, but UKIP is too monomaniacally focussed on the EU, too full of blazer-wearing retired colonels and too prone to define its reactionary politics in terms of hankering after the days when good old Smithy was running Rhodesia. There’s a certain market for that sort of thing, but it’s a limited and ageing market. The BNP is a lot more streetwise, but it’s been hampered in turn by being full of thugs – you can sell racism to the electorate, but it’s harder to sell thuggery – and by being mired in Third Reich nostalgia.

Griffin understands this. He is well aware that for decades the Austrian Freedom Party bounced around on about 5% of the vote – its spectacular growth under Haider was precisely the result of Haider spending years distancing the party from its Nazi and Pan-German roots in favour of a more contemporary appeal. Fini has done something similar in Italy, as has (to a much lesser extent) Le Pen in France. To say nothing of the various hard-right parties on the continent who don’t have roots in pre-war fascism. Fidelity to the fascist tradition may keep a cadre together in hard times, but it does severely limit the possibilities of appealing to a broader audience.

That’s why the Griffin leadership has been throwing old fascist shibbolethim overboard with gay abandon. You see a lot of this in the foreign policy sphere. Traditionally, the British far right has had an anti-Zionist stance deriving from its anti-Semitism. Sometimes this has shaded into a vague Arabism, and even into saluting the indefatigability of Saddam and Gaddafi. Yet today we find the BNP taking a staunchly pro-Israeli position, which might be surprising from a group that not so long ago was selling Holocaust denial tracts in its bookshop. But this is only surprising if you assume that fascists can’t have an opportunistic streak, and are so stupid they don’t realise that, while anti-Semitism isn’t respectable any more, there is a good deal of mileage to be had from bashing the Muslims.

And as with the Middle East, so with the Balkans. Recently the BNP has been banging the drum in favour of Serbian sovereignty in Kosovo. And yet, during the Yugoslav wars when such positions were actually relevant, the BNP held fast to the traditional fascist position of calling for victory to Croatia. Indeed, if memory serves, some BNP guys tried to set up an “International Brigade” to fight for the Croats, who were supposed to be defending European civilisation from the communist Serbs. Is it likely that Griffin has suddenly discovered a deep affinity for Serbia? I think not. It’s more likely that the new BNP position has its roots in Londoners’ fear and loathing of violent Albanian gangsters.

But what’s more important is domestic politics. This means going into run-down estates that Labour has pretty much abandoned, and offering people a seductive cocktail of what looks at first glance very like Old Labour politics, combined with racism as a global explanation of the working class’s woes. In certain working-class areas, especially racially segregated places like Oldham or Dewsbury, or white flight areas like Dagenham, you can understand the appeal to people at the bottom of the pile.

What’s obviously called for is an imaginative response. I think what Cruddas has been doing at grassroots level in Dagenham is interesting for this reason, that Cruddas understands that the white working class tends to be resistant to moralistic appeals from do-gooders, and that an anti-fascist and anti-racist strategy needs to be tied in to offering some kind of politics of hope and solidarity. Cruddas reckons you can do this by reconnecting the Labour Party with its core base. Maybe you can, maybe you can’t. But thinking along these lines is vital if we want to do anything beyond contemplating Barnbrook in City Hall and throwing up our hands in horror.

More on this at Socialist Unity.

14 Comments

  1. Doug said,

    May 7, 2008 at 3:23 pm

    Fawning over Cruddas by Newman I can understand cos Newman’s politics are all over the shop but I expected more from you. Cruddas is a devious little opportunist whose only interest is to resurrect New Labour, undercut the BNP and get the loyal Labour vote out again (and save his own career into the bargain). In any case, doing anything under the Labour name/umbrella is the kiss of death – forget it.

    You’re right though that moralising will not win over white workers seduced by the BNP. Nor will the pathetic woolly, apolitical UAF/Searchlight Hope not Hate, their really Nazis you know, broad fronts with anyone and everyone including Tories/New Labour. That has clearly failed (and was doomed to in the first place). What is necessary are class-based arguments around housing, low pay, crime, rights at work, inequality, ill health and addressing the immigration issue in an open and principled way. Unless what we say – or more importantly do – resonates with working class people and their concerns we’re wasting our time.

  2. Ciarán said,

    May 7, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    Hasn’t the Independent Working Class Association been trying for years to do the kind of work that most people are only now realising needs to be done, and they didn’t have a particularly good election.

  3. jack r said,

    May 7, 2008 at 5:18 pm

    effect of doing that kind of politics, whilst isolating yourself from other groups … so or later the lack of resources and national profile is going to work against you.

  4. charliemarks said,

    May 8, 2008 at 1:35 am

    Cruddas as New Labour revivalist? Not the case – he’s backed by union leaders, not by Big Ears and Mandy.

    Yes, the IWCA have been wiped out, unfortunately. But then, only in electoral terms.

  5. Darren said,

    May 8, 2008 at 3:53 am

    I’d be interested to know how much physical and financial resources put into unseating the IWCA councillors.

    I can’t help having the impression that they pull the stops out when some group perceived to be on the left of them is meeting with some electoral success.

  6. Mbari said,

    May 8, 2008 at 6:42 am

    Stuart Craft won his seat, didn’t he?

  7. Doug said,

    May 8, 2008 at 9:18 am

    Darren’s right the Labour Party in Coventry moved heaven and earth to dislodge Dave Nellist. On the subject of the ICWA in Oxford and their class approach – how much of a threat are the BNP in working class areas of the city? Exactly.

  8. Cian said,

    May 8, 2008 at 9:58 am

    There really is no fundamental reason why Britain can’t have a sizeable right-populist party like you have in several European countries.

    First past the post electoral system? Seems like a good reason to me.

  9. May 8, 2008 at 1:06 pm

    […] was quite widely read. I have updated it here to reflect recent events. (Also worth checking out Splintered Sunrise on this […]

  10. Andy newman said,

    May 8, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    Doug, when you say: “In any case, doing anything under the Labour name/umbrella is the kiss of death – forget it.”

    Can you explain how in the City and East constituency which contains the BNP’s strongholds of Barking and Dagenham, the BNP came fourth with 18020 votes (9.8%). Labour’s vote went up from 38085 votes in 2004 to 63635 votes in 2008, an whopping 62,5% increase, (and an 8.6% swing of the total vote).

  11. Doug said,

    May 8, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    Yes I can explain – traditional working class anti-Toryism, roused by the Johnson campaign. Or was it a sudden conversion to the joys of new Labourism?

  12. Andy newman said,

    May 8, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    No, Doug, you are not being very precise.

    There was a generall rise in the Labour vote accross London. but nothing like what we saw in City and East, where there was a 62% increase in the Labour vote.

    Firstly, this was becasue although JOhn Biggs the candidate was indeed New Labour, the Labour vote was reflecting both the association with the old labour Ken Livingstone, which especially articulated the inner city BME vote, but it also relects focused anti-BNP campaiging in Barking and Dagenham to gett he vote out against the BNP.

    Just becasue you have decided that the Labour party is a waste of time doesn;t mean that the millions of labour voters have all reached that same conclusion.

  13. May 9, 2008 at 12:25 pm

    […] May Day Massacre, part 2: Gauleiter Barnbrook goes to City Hall « Splintered Sunrise […]

  14. JimPage said,

    May 16, 2008 at 8:40 am

    Andy Newman said

    “but it also relects focused anti-BNP campaiging in Barking and Dagenham to get the vote out against the BNP”

    So that is why the BNP, on the Assembly lists, beat Labour outright in 7 of the 17 B&D wards, coming top of the poll?
    That is just 2 wards short of taking the council.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: